Antitrust's Greatest Hits. / David B. Kopel and Joseph Bast.
by Kopel, David B; SIRS Publishing, Inc.
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2f4d/a2f4d642efbc5b32ed2403b31db2a48f2dbf92cc" alt="materialTypeLabel"
Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing High School - old - to delete Shelves Close shelf browser
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2002.
Originally Published: Antitrust's Greatest Hits, Nov. 2001; pp. 28-35.
"It is...time to take an even longer historical perspective: to look at the government's earlier adventures in antitrust and see how they compare with the Microsoft case. The results are very telling--not just with regard to Microsoft, but to antitrust law in general. Indeed, when one looks closely at the ground-breaking government actions taken against Standard Oil, the Aluminum Company of America, and AT&T, it becomes clear that something other than preventing harm to consumers--the stated goal of federal antitrust legislation--is the motivating force behind applying the law." (REASON) This article takes a look at various antitrust cases and compares them with the case the government brought against Microsoft.
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.