Annals of Medicine: As Good As Dead. / Gary Greenberg.
by Greenberg, Gary; SIRS Publishing, Inc.
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2f4d/a2f4d642efbc5b32ed2403b31db2a48f2dbf92cc" alt="materialTypeLabel"
Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
High School - old - to delete | SIRS FAM2 75 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2002.
Originally Published: Annals of Medicine: As Good As Dead, Aug. 6, 2001; pp. n.p..
"Confusion about the concept of brain death is not unusual, even among the transplant professionals, surgeons, neurologists, and bioethicists who grapple with it regularly. Brain death is confusing because it's an artificial distinction constructed, more than thirty years ago, on a conceptional foundation that is unsound. Recently, some physicians have begun to suggest that brain-dead patients aren't really dead at all--that the concept is just the medical profession's way of dodging ethical questions about a practice that saves more than fifteen thousand lives a year." (NEW YORKER) The author disputes that individuals can ever be classified as "brain dead" and insinuates that the medical profession created the diagnosis in order to justify organ transplants from living bodies.
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.