Library Logo
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Scientists Draft Rules on Ethics for Stem Cells. Nicholas Wade.

by Wade, Nicholas; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2006Article 10Human Relations. Publisher: New York Times, 2005ISSN: 1522-3248;.Subject(s): Embryonic stem cells | Medical ethics | Mosaicism | Religion and politics | Stem cells | Stem cells -- Law and legislationDDC classification: 050 Summary: "Citing a lack of leadership by the federal government, the National Academy of Sciences proposed ethical guidelines yesterday [April 26, 2005] for research with human embryonic stem cells....The academy hopes its proposals, which are nonbinding, will be accepted in the private and public sectors, particularly in states like California that are creating ambitious stem cell programs." (NEW YORK TIMES) This article details how the National Academy of Sciences, "a self-elected group of scientists that advises the government, recommends setting up a system of local and national committees for reviewing stem cell research. It also tackles a new set of ethical problems raised by creating organisms composed of cells from two different species, and in this case animals that include human cells."
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due
Books Books High School - old - to delete
REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 10 (Browse shelf) Available
Browsing High School - old - to delete Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available No cover image available No cover image available No cover image available No cover image available No cover image available No cover image available
REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 1 The Changing Rules of Organ Donation. REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 1 Strangers' Organ Donations Concern MDs. REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 10 Use of Stem Cells in California Creates Ethical Dilemma over.... REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 10 Scientists Draft Rules on Ethics for Stem Cells. REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 11 Personal Responsibility Waning, Experts Say. REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 12 When Tom Met Jack. REF SIRS 2006 Human Relations Article 12 Jack in a Box.

Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2006.

Originally Published: Scientists Draft Rules on Ethics for Stem Cells, April 27, 2005; pp. A1+.

"Citing a lack of leadership by the federal government, the National Academy of Sciences proposed ethical guidelines yesterday [April 26, 2005] for research with human embryonic stem cells....The academy hopes its proposals, which are nonbinding, will be accepted in the private and public sectors, particularly in states like California that are creating ambitious stem cell programs." (NEW YORK TIMES) This article details how the National Academy of Sciences, "a self-elected group of scientists that advises the government, recommends setting up a system of local and national committees for reviewing stem cell research. It also tackles a new set of ethical problems raised by creating organisms composed of cells from two different species, and in this case animals that include human cells."

Records created from non-MARC resource.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha