Devolution. H. Allen Orr.
by Orr, H. Allen; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2006Article 32Science. Publisher: New Yorker, 2005ISSN: 1522-3264;.Subject(s): Cells -- Evolution | Education -- Curricula | Evolution (Biology) | Flagella (Microbiology) | Intelligent design theory | Life -- Origin | Natural selection | Religion and scienceDDC classification: 050 Summary: "First of all, intelligent design is not what people often assume it is. For one thing, I.D. is not Biblical literalism. Unlike earlier generations of creationists--the so-called Young Earthers and scientific creationists--proponents of intelligent design do not believe that the universe was created in six days, that Earth is ten thousand years old, or that the fossil record was deposited during Noah's flood....Nor does I.D. flatly reject evolution: adherents freely admit that some evolutionary change occurred during the history of life on Earth." (NEW YORKER) This article compares Darwinism and Intelligent Design.Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS 2006 Science Article 32 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2006.
Originally Published: Devolution, May 30, 2005; pp. 40+.
"First of all, intelligent design is not what people often assume it is. For one thing, I.D. is not Biblical literalism. Unlike earlier generations of creationists--the so-called Young Earthers and scientific creationists--proponents of intelligent design do not believe that the universe was created in six days, that Earth is ten thousand years old, or that the fossil record was deposited during Noah's flood....Nor does I.D. flatly reject evolution: adherents freely admit that some evolutionary change occurred during the history of life on Earth." (NEW YORKER) This article compares Darwinism and Intelligent Design.
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.