000			01456cam a2200289 4500
001			0000005122
005			20150716090939.0
008			011109s xx 000 0 eng
022			_a1522-3191;
050		0	_aAC1.S5
082	0		_a050
100	1		_aNelson, Michael.
245	1	4	_aThe Lottery Gamble. / _cMichael Nelson.
260			_bAmerican Prospect, _c2001.
440		0	_aSIRS Enduring Issues 2002. _nArticle 31. _pBusiness, _x1522-3191;
500			_aArticles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2002.
500			_aOriginally Published: The Lottery Gamble, June 4, 2001; pp. 19-21.
520			_a"To state governments caught in a vise between greater revenue needs and widespread opposition to taxes, the lottery seemed an appealing way out. During the late 1960s and the 1970s, 12 states (mostly in the Northeast) legalized lotteries....The desire for nontax revenues was not the only thing fueling the spread of lotteries; there also was a competitive pressure on the states that didn't have a lottery." (AMERICAN PROSPECT) This article examines state lottery revenues and the effect such monies have on local economies.
599			_aRecords created from non-MARC resource.
650		0	_aDeceptive advertising.
650		0	_aInternet gambling.
650		0	_aLotteries.
650		0	_aRevenue.
650		0	_aState governments.
710	2		_aSIRS Publishing, Inc. _tSIRS Enduring Issues 2002. _pBusiness., _x1522-3191.
942			_c UKN
999			_c33136 _d33136