000 | 01731 a2200289 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 040419s xx 000 0 eng | ||
022 | _a1522-3221; | ||
050 | _aAC1.S5 | ||
082 | _a050 | ||
100 | _aKmiec, Douglas W., | ||
245 | 0 |
_aQ: Should Senate Rules Be Changed to Limit Debate on Judicial.... _cDouglas W. Kmiec and Ralph G. Neas. |
|
260 |
_bInsight on the News, _c2003. |
||
440 |
_aSIRS Enduring Issues 2004. _nArticle 36, _pGlobal Issues, _x1522-3221; |
||
500 | _aArticles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2004. | ||
500 | _aOriginally Published: Q: Should Senate Rules Be Changed to Limit Debate on Judicial..., July 22-Aug. 4, 2003; pp. 46-49. | ||
520 | _a"For months now more than a majority of the U.S. Senate has been prepared to confirm several highly talented men and women to seats on the federal bench. Yet Miguel Estrada, President George W. Bush's nominee to be the first Hispanic to serve on the prestigious U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and Priscilla Owen, a Texas Supreme Court justice who has been nominated to the 5th Circuit, can't be brought to a vote." (INSIGHT) This article debates whether Senate rules should be changed to limit debate on judicial nominations. | ||
599 | _aRecords created from non-MARC resource. | ||
650 | _aDebates and debating | ||
610 | _aDemocratic Party (U.S.) | ||
650 | _aFilibusters (Political science) | ||
650 |
_aJudges _xSelection and appointment |
||
610 | _aRepublican Party (U.S.) | ||
610 |
_aUnited States _bCongress _xRules and practice |
||
610 |
_aUnited States _bCongress _bSenate |
||
710 |
_aProQuest Information and Learning Company _tSIRS Enduring Issues 2004, _pGlobal Issues. _x1522-3221; |
||
942 | _c UKN | ||
999 |
_c35303 _d35303 |