000			01835 a2200265 4500
008			041203s xx 000 0 eng
022			_a1522-3191;
050			_aAC1.S5
082			_a050
100			_a,
245		0	_aRanking the Rich 2004. _c.
260			_bForeign Policy, _c2004.
440			_aSIRS Enduring Issues 2005. _nArticle 16, _pBusiness, _x1522-3191;
500			_aArticles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2005.
500			_aOriginally Published: Ranking the Rich 2004, May/June 2004; pp. 46-56.
520			_a"The world's poor countries are ultimately responsible for their own development--and for years, rich countries have measured, categorized, scored, advised, and admonished them to cut their budget deficits, invest more in education, or liberalize their financial markets. Last year, the Center for Global Development (CGD) and Foreign Policy turned the tables: We created the Commitment to Development Index (CDI), a ranking of rich nations according to how their policies help or hinder social and economic development in the poor countries. One year and much additional data later, we unveil a second edition of the CDI that brings into sharper focus which governments lead the global community in the challenge of development." (FOREIGN POLICY) This article analyzes the findings of the 2004 Commitment to Development Index and compares them with last year's results.
599			_aRecords created from non-MARC resource.
650			_aEconomic assistance _zDeveloping countries
650			_aEconomic development
650			_aEconomic development projects _zDeveloping countries
650			_aInvestments _xForeign _zDeveloping countries
650			_aNorth and South
710			_aProQuest Information and Learning Company _tSIRS Enduring Issues 2005, _pBusiness. _x1522-3191;
942			_c UKN
999			_c35975 _d35975