000			01808 a2200277 4500
008			051207s xx 000 0 eng
022			_a1522-3248;
050			_aAC1.S5
082			_a050
100			_aWade, Nicholas,
245		0	_aScientists Draft Rules on Ethics for Stem Cells. _cNicholas Wade.
260			_bNew York Times, _c2005.
440			_aSIRS Enduring Issues 2006. _nArticle 10, _pHuman Relations, _x1522-3248;
500			_aArticles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2006.
500			_aOriginally Published: Scientists Draft Rules on Ethics for Stem Cells, April 27, 2005; pp. A1+.
520			_a"Citing a lack of leadership by the federal government, the National Academy of Sciences proposed ethical guidelines yesterday [April 26, 2005] for research with human embryonic stem cells....The academy hopes its proposals, which are nonbinding, will be accepted in the private and public sectors, particularly in states like California that are creating ambitious stem cell programs." (NEW YORK TIMES) This article details how the National Academy of Sciences, "a self-elected group of scientists that advises the government, recommends setting up a system of local and national committees for reviewing stem cell research. It also tackles a new set of ethical problems raised by creating organisms composed of cells from two different species, and in this case animals that include human cells."
599			_aRecords created from non-MARC resource.
650			_aEmbryonic stem cells
650			_aMedical ethics
650			_aMosaicism
650			_aReligion and politics
650			_aStem cells
650			_aStem cells _xLaw and legislation
710			_aProQuest Information and Learning Company _tSIRS Enduring Issues 2006, _pHuman Relations. _x1522-3248;
942			_c UKN
999			_c37493 _d37493