Dealing with Aging Executives Who Just Won't Quit. Patrick McGeehan.
by McGeehan, Patrick; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2004Article 43Family. Publisher: New York Times, 2003ISSN: 1522-3213;.Subject(s): Aged -- Employment | Chief executive officers | Retirement | Retirement age | Work -- Psychological aspectsDDC classification: 050 Summary: "Age is a sensitive issue in the workplace. As retirement begins to look less appealing and often less feasible, many older but still vibrant Americans want to hang on to their jobs longer. Corporations, on the other hand, usually encourage workers to retire at 65 or younger because they generally cost more in wages and health benefits." (NEW YORK TIMES) This article profiles several "well-known chairmen and chief executives working past 65" and discusses federal law that protects employees and creates a "touchy problem for companies."| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 43 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing High School - old - to delete Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 41 Puzzle of the Century. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 42 Burbs Now a Gray Area. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 42 Developers Target Communities at Aging Boomers. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 43 Dealing with Aging Executives Who Just Won't Quit. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 43 Too Old to Work?. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 44 Targeting Boomers. | REF SIRS 2004 Family Article 44 Old Diggers. |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2004.
Originally Published: Dealing with Aging Executives Who Just Won't Quit, Feb. 2, 2003; pp. 1+.
"Age is a sensitive issue in the workplace. As retirement begins to look less appealing and often less feasible, many older but still vibrant Americans want to hang on to their jobs longer. Corporations, on the other hand, usually encourage workers to retire at 65 or younger because they generally cost more in wages and health benefits." (NEW YORK TIMES) This article profiles several "well-known chairmen and chief executives working past 65" and discusses federal law that protects employees and creates a "touchy problem for companies."
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.